Court: No Attorney Fees Against Security Fund
In a recent decision, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania addressed a key question for injured workers statewide. Can a Workers’ Compensation Judge order the Workers’ Compensation Security Fund to pay attorney fees?
The Commonwealth Court recently decided Randall E. Parrish v. Yeager Supply, Inc. (Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board), No. 443 C.D. 2024 (Pa. Cmwlth. filed Feb. 5, 2026). The Court decided that the Security Fund cannot pay attorney fees.
Section 440 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act does not allow these fees. The holding applies even when the injured worker wins.
This ruling carries real consequences for injured workers who pursue utilization review petitions and other contested claims. We will explore the decision’s impact on injured workers’ access to Counsel.
What Happened in the Parrish Case?
What led to the dispute?
Randall Parrish suffered a work injury in 1998. Years later, he entered into a Compromise and Release Agreement. Under that agreement, the employer agreed to cover all reasonable and necessary medical treatment related to his injury.
Later, the employer challenged the reasonableness and necessity of chiropractic treatment Mr. Parrish received beginning January 7, 2020.
A Utilization Review Organization partially denied the treatment. In response, Mr. Parrish filed a Petition for Review of Utilization Review Determination. He asked a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to find that the treatment remained reasonable and necessary.
What did the Workers’ Compensation Judge decide?
After hearings, the WCJ ruled in Mr. Parrish’s favor. The judge found:
- The chiropractic treatment remained reasonable and necessary.
- The employer’s contest qualified as reasonable.
- Despite the reasonable contest, attorney fees should be awarded under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Lorino v. WCAB.
The WCJ awarded:
- $502.95 in litigation costs
- $2,161.50 in attorney fees
At that point, the Workers’ Compensation Security Fund appealed—but only the attorney fee award.
What Role Does the Workers’ Compensation Security Fund Play?
What is the Security Fund?
The Workers’ Compensation Security Fund pays benefits when an employer’s insurance carrier becomes insolvent. It steps in to make sure injured workers continue to receive wage loss and medical benefits.
However, the Security Fund does not function as a traditional insurance company. It operates as a statutorily created entity with limited obligations defined by the Workers’ Compensation Act.
Why did the Security Fund object to paying attorney fees?
The Security Fund argued that:
- Section 440 of the Workers’ Compensation Act permits attorney fee awards only against an “employer” or an “insurer.”
- The Act’s definition of “insurer” does not include the Security Fund.
- Because the Security Fund does not meet the statutory definition of insurer, it cannot pay attorney fees.
The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board agreed and vacated the attorney fee award.
Mr. Parrish then appealed to the Commonwealth Court.
What Does Section 440 of the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act Say?
When do attorney fees get awarded?
Section 440(a) of the Act allows attorney fees in contested cases when the injured worker prevails.
Under the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Lorino, attorney fees qualify as mandatory unless the employer establishes a reasonable basis for its contest. If the contest qualifies as reasonable, the WCJ may exclude attorney fees at their discretion.
In Mr. Parrish’s case:
- The WCJ found the employer’s contest reasonable.
- The WCJ still chose to award attorney fees.
The legal question focused on whether the WCJ had authority to assess those fees against the Security Fund.
Why Did the Commonwealth Court Deny Attorney Fees Against the Security Fund?

Does Section 440 apply to the Security Fund?
The Commonwealth Court held that it does not.
The Court relied on prior decisions, including Lebanon Valley Brethren Home v. WCAB (Flammer). In that case, the Court concluded that the Security Fund does not qualify as an “insurer” under Section 401 of the Act.
Section 401 defines “insurer” as:
- The State Workers’ Insurance Fund
- Another insurance carrier that insures the employer’s liability
- A self-insured employer
The Security Fund does not appear in that definition.
Section 440 authorizes attorney fee awards only against employers or insurers. The WCJ could not assess fees against the Security Fund.
Did it matter that the employer’s contest was reasonable?
No.
The Court explained that Lorino allows discretion on attorney fees in a reasonable contest. But that discretion applies only when Section 440 applies. Since Section 440 does not cover the Security Fund, the WCJ had no authority to award attorney fees in the first place.
The Commonwealth Court affirmed the Board’s decision and vacated the $2,161.50 attorney fee award.
What Does This Decision Mean for Injured Workers?

Will I recover attorney fees if the Security Fund handles my claim?
After this decision, injured workers should expect that:
- If the Security Fund stands in place of an insolvent insurer,
- And you win a contested petition,
- You likely cannot recover attorney fees under Section 440.
You may still recover litigation costs, such as filing fees and medical witness fees. However, a WCJ lacks authority to award attorney fees.
Why does this matter in utilization review cases?
Utilization review disputes often involve ongoing medical treatment. When an injured worker must hire counsel to challenge a denial of care, the attorney expects compensation. Now, if the Security Fund manages the claim, even a successful outcome may not result in a fee award.
That financial reality can make obtaining counsel to litigate smaller issues more difficult.
Does This Affect All Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Claims?
Yes. The Court’s holding broadly exempts the Security Fund from Section 440.
When does this ruling apply?
This ruling applies when:
- The employer’s insurer becomes insolvent, and
- The Workers’ Compensation Security Fund takes over the claim.
If a private insurer or a self-insured employer handles the claim, Section 440 still applies in full. In those cases, a WCJ may award attorney fees consistent with Lorino.
This ruling is also likely to preclude an attorney fee award when an Employer has no insurance. The Uninsured Employer’s Guaranty Fund pays those claims in a similar status to the Security Fund.
Could the legislature change this rule?
Yes. If the Pennsylvania General Assembly amends the Act, it could define the Security Fund as an “insurer.” Then, attorney fee awards could become available in the future. Until that happens, courts will likely continue to follow this interpretation.
How Should Injured Workers Respond?
What steps should I take if the Security Fund manages my claim?
If the Security Fund steps in:
- Understand that attorney fee recovery may not occur under Section 440.
- Discuss fee agreements carefully with your workers’ compensation attorney.
Each case carries unique facts. Strategic decisions depend on medical evidence, benefit exposure, and long-term treatment needs.
Final Thoughts on the Parrish Decision
The Commonwealth Court’s ruling in Parrish v. Yeager Supply clarifies an important limitation within Pennsylvania workers’ compensation law. While injured workers can challenge medical denials and file utilization review petitions, Section 440 fees do not apply.
You cannot claim these attorney fee awards against the Workers’ Compensation Security Fund.
For injured workers with medical treatment disputes, this difference matters. This is most important when an insurer is insolvent. In that case, the Security Fund may intervene.
If you have questions about recovering attorney fees, talk to an experienced attorney. You can call our office 24/7 for a free and confidential claim evaluation: 216-609-4183.
























































































