Medical Evidence In PA Workers’ Comp Cases
In PA workers’ compensation cases, medical evidence helps to prove a claim. Injured workers rely on medical evidence to show that their work injury directly caused their disability. It shows a causal relationship between the injury and work activity.
Not all claims need detailed medical testimony. In some cases, the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) may find a direct, obvious link between the injury and disability. The WCJ may allow the worker to file a claim without extensive medical evidence.
Obvious Causal Connection
When obvious causal relationships exist between work injuries and disabilities, claims may not need medical testimony for support. Courts know that some injuries have a clear connection to work activities, making medical expert testimony unnecessary. Morgan v. Giant Markets, Inc. showed that claims can proceed without medical evidence. Providing, a layperson can readily understand the connection.
Mental Trauma
In Vactor v. WCAB, a worker developed emotional trauma after suffering a gunshot wound during a robbery. The court found that the trauma obviously caused the worker’s fear of returning to work. This finding made medical testimony unnecessary.
Immediate Pain
In Northwest Medical Center v. WCAB, a worker suffered pain immediately after a physical exertion. The court found an obvious connection between the pain and the work activity. This negated the need for a medical expert’s opinion.
Delayed Or Cumulative Injuries
By contrast, injuries that develop over time present less clearcut cases. Cumulative trauma injuries require clear medical evidence to prove a work relation.
The ruling in Albert Einstein Healthcare v. WCAB illustrates this. They found symptoms that develop over time require medical expert testimony. The medical expert must verify that the work injury caused the condition.
Lay Testimony
In certain cases, an injured worker’s testimony alone can support a claim. This may occur when a worker returns to the job with restrictions after an injury.
In Latta v. WCAB, the court ruled that a worker’s own testimony was enough to reinstate benefits. This occurred after a lay off from a light-duty role. The court presumed that the worker’s pre-injury state remained compromised. This supported the continuation of benefits.
When Lay Testimony Falls Short
While lay testimony can support specific claims, it does not apply to every claim. For example, an injured worker under a “medical-only” Notice of Compensation Payable (NCP) without wage loss benefits. In this instance, testimony alone will likely not suffice. Credible medical evidence must show that the worker’s injury still affects their earning capacity.
Medical Experts In Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Cases
In PA workers’ comp cases, not all healthcare providers qualify as expert witnesses. The expert witness must hold the appropriate qualifications and experience to testify in specialized medical areas.
Physicians
The court typically recognizes board-certified physicians as qualified to testify on a wide range of medical issues. This often holds true even if they lack specialization in the specific area of the worker’s injury.
Psychologists
Licensed psychologists can testify in cases that involve an employee’s mental health. They cannot diagnose physical injuries.
Chiropractors
Chiropractors can testify, but their scope remains limited to chiropractic care issues. They cannot provide testimony on conditions outside their field.
Nurses
Experienced nurses may testify on matters of patient care and observations. But, courts usually do not recognize them as competent to diagnose or provide opinions on complex causal relationships.
The “Unequivocal” Standard
When a case requires medical evidence, the testimony must remain clear and unequivocal. This means the expert must express a clear opinion that the injury resulted from a work-related event. Statements like “possibly” or “could be” do not meet this standard.
Courts require a direct connection between the work injury and the resulting disability. The medical expert must assert this to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.
Medical experts who express uncertainty will weaken the worker’s case. This can lead to a denial of benefits. They need to provide consistent, confident testimony that links the injury directly to work activities.
Conflicting Opinions
The WCJ holds the authority to weigh conflicting medical evidence and decide which testimony carries more credibility. A treating doctor’s testimony may carry more weight because of their familiarity with the worker’s condition. In cases where the Independent Medical Examination (IME) challenges the claim, the WCJ can still favor the treating doctor. This may occur when their history shows insight into the worker’s pre-injury and post-injury condition.
New Facts
Medical opinions can change if new evidence comes up during a workers’ comp case. If a medical expert forms an opinion based on incomplete or inaccurate information, this can render their testimony unreliable.
Medical Reports Over Live Testimony
Medical reports and affidavits can replace live testimony when the claim period lasts 52 weeks or less. These documents must meet specific standards for admissibility and accuracy.
Hospital Records
Hospital records that detail treatments for work-related injuries qualify as admissible evidence in workers’ compensation claims. Courts limit admissibility to details directly related to the work injury. These records must provide clear evidence that support the medical claim.
Termination Of Benefits
To terminate workers’ comp benefits, an employer or insurance company must provide compelling medical evidence. They must show that the injured worker has fully recovered by providing detailed and consistent medical testimony.
Wrap Up
Medical evidence plays an important role in PA workers’ comp cases. If the case will require a medical expert or expert witness depends.
This can depend on the nature of the injury. It may depend on the causal relationship between the injury and work. Or, it could depend on the clarity of this connection.
In cases with an obvious causal relationship, injured workers might bypass medical testimony. In more complex workers’ comp claims, clear and unequivocal expert testimony becomes a must.
A workers’ comp lawyer knows the requirements of Pennsylvania workers’ compensation laws. They can advise you on the specific needs for your case.
If you have questions about your claim or think you have a case, give us a call. Reach out to our offices 24/7 at (215) 609-4183 for a free case evaluation. We can help get you the benefits you deserve.